Former elections supervisor Mohammed Saneem recently testified in the Suva Magistrate’s Court, detailing his experience in police detention, which he described as inhumane. During cross-examination by attorney Devanesh Sharma, Saneem expressed frustration over being prevented from attending his daughter’s birthday celebration at home.
Saneem faces charges for allegedly receiving a corrupt benefit amounting to $55,944.03, which he claims has breached his fundamental human rights. He is challenging the legitimacy of these charges sanctioned by then-acting Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) John Rabuku.
The court proceedings included discussions regarding the powers of the Fijian Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) under the Electoral Act, which facilitated the investigation and prosecution of Saneem.
On March 8 of the previous year, Saneem stated he received a call from someone impersonating a police officer involved in a rape case. Subsequently, two officers arrived to arrest him without providing a clear reason for his detention. He recounted how police officials, allegedly acting on directives from the acting DPP, denied his request to attend his daughter’s birthday, dismissing his pleas with laughter.
Upon his arrival at the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Saneem described being placed in a cell where he encountered unsanitary conditions, including being exposed to a drunken individual and encountering rat feces. He reported that this treatment exacerbated his existing medical conditions, such as panic attacks.
The court learned that his legal counsel had submitted inquiries to Mr. Rabuku regarding these issues, yet received minimal communication, which delayed the process. Both Sharma and acting DPP Nancy Tikoisuva now have seven days to submit additional information, with a ruling expected on December 17.
This case highlights serious concerns regarding the treatment of individuals in custody and the impact that such treatment can have on their physical and mental well-being. It also emphasizes the ongoing challenges within legal and institutional frameworks that need attention. The forthcoming ruling may pave the way toward addressing these critical human right issues and ensuring better practices in the future.
Leave a comment