Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has clarified the nature of his conversation with suspended Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Pryde, asserting that it was not related to any ongoing investigation by the Criminal Investigations Department. During his court testimony, Sayed-Khaiyum explained that their discussion revolved around personal matters concerning their families, specifically mentioning their children, Emma and Ibrahim.
He defended the length and content of his conversation with Pryde, highlighting that he had engaged with many individuals at the event, including various ambassadors and members of Parliament. Sayed-Khaiyum objected to the suggestion that their interaction was inappropriate, emphasizing that both he and Pryde maintain a high standard of ethical conduct.
Addressing allegations regarding Pryde’s superannuation payments, Sayed-Khaiyum stated that such matters fall under the purview of the Judicial Services Commission and reiterated that he played a minimal role. He admitted that keeping track of payments for all Constitutional Office Holders, including Pryde, wasn’t something he could accurately recall.
In response to accusations regarding the Minister of Justice’s relationships with individuals under investigation, Sayed-Khaiyum indicated that he had formally lodged a complaint with the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) regarding the conduct of certain officials. He mentioned that this matter is currently under investigation.
A tribunal is evaluating allegations of misconduct related to Pryde, advising that considerations for his removal from the DPP position may be forthcoming. It should be noted that on February 28, 2023, the suspended DPP was seen engaging in a lengthy conversation with Sayed-Khaiyum amid ongoing investigations into the former Attorney-General.
The case is ongoing, with further proceedings scheduled for the following day.
This situation underscores the complexities involved in the legal system and the importance of transparency and accountability in governance. As investigations continue, there is hope that truth and justice will prevail.
In summary, the article discusses a court testimony by Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum regarding his interactions with Christopher Pryde amidst ongoing investigations, and raises questions about ethical conduct and the administrative processes concerning public office remuneration.
Leave a comment