The High Court in Suva has scheduled a hearing date regarding the strike-out application filed by former Director of Public Prosecutions, Neelraj Sharma. This legal motion pertains to compensation claims amounting to $800,244 made by Veronica Malani against 11 individuals involved in the investigation of an alleged bombing case from 1987.
All legal representatives attended the session presided over by Justice Usaia Ratuvili on Wednesday. During this hearing, Sharma’s attorney, Ronal Singh, expressed readiness to proceed with a hearing date. However, Malani’s lawyer, Sitiveni Raikanikoda, was granted additional time to prepare and ensure his presence in court.
The hearing has been set for December 11, and all parties involved are expected to submit their arguments prior to this date. Mr. Raikanikoda raised concerns regarding the defense’s adherence to proper civil procedures, pointing out that the defense attorneys had not filed a statement of defense after being served the writ of summons. Instead, they opted directly for filing a strike-out application.
He also questioned the representation of former acting Police Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu and retired Assistant Police Commissioner Biu Matavou, the fifth and sixth defendants respectively. Raikanikoda noted that although they are retired officials, they were represented by the Office of the Attorney-General. He inquired whether they should have their own legal representation and file submissions, given their inclusion in the lawsuit. Justice Ratuvili responded that, regardless of their appearance, the court proceedings would continue.
This case highlights the complexities involved in legal proceedings, particularly when addressing historical cases that involve multiple parties and intricate procedural aspects. The court’s decision to keep the trial moving forward offers a glimpse of the legal system’s commitment to accountability, which ultimately is a positive step toward justice.
In summary, the upcoming hearing scheduled for December 11 will be significant as it may clarify procedural discrepancies and set the stage for the next steps in this long-standing legal matter.
Leave a comment