A recent social survey conducted by the Housing Ministry has revealed that a significant number of individuals residing in squatter or informal settlements are financially stable enough to acquire proper housing. Manasa Lesuma, the permanent secretary, acknowledged that while some residents face genuine financial difficulties, many others have the means to secure better living conditions but choose to remain in their current situations.
This discovery raises important questions regarding the government’s strategy for addressing informal settlements. Lesuma suggested that the findings indicate a substantial portion of those living in these areas are capable of affording proper housing, yet opt to stay. This situation has significant implications for the government’s plans.
To tackle the issue, the government is formulating a new initiative aimed at relocating individuals from informal settlements. One pilot project is focusing on the relocation of residents from the Veidogo settlement in Vatuwaqa. Additionally, there is a collaboration between the ministry and Habitat for Humanity for a separate relocation project.
Lesuma stated, “We conduct social surveys to assess a family’s earning capacity, identify those deserving of relocation, and detect individuals who are exploiting the system.” He pointed out that tenants who are financially stable but still living in informal settlements may face eviction, especially if they own rental properties elsewhere.
Many of the settlements in question have been improved, featuring subdivided lots, adequate road access that complies with Fiji Roads Authority standards, and proper utility services. Lesuma attributed the increase in informal settlements, particularly in the Suva-Nausori corridor, to a shift in population from rural to urban areas, which has led to a surge in these settlements and intensified pressure on urban infrastructure and resources.
The survey’s results are poised to influence policy-making and resource distribution significantly. It is essential, according to the ministry, for policymakers to differentiate between those genuinely in need of assistance and those who have the financial capability to secure better housing but prefer to remain in informal settlements. Such clarity will facilitate more effective targeted interventions to address the underlying issues contributing to these informal settlements.
While the Housing Ministry’s proactive approach presents promise, the overall success may hinge on a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted factors motivating informal settlements and a commitment to addressing the varying needs of all involved parties.