The year 2025 will be significant for veteran governance commentator Graham Teskey, marking three decades of his engagement in governance discourse, which began during his tenure with the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID). Teskey, who has also worked with the World Bank and currently leads Abt Global’s Global Governance practice, reflects on the evolution of governance ideas that have intrigued him, particularly amid significant changes within development agencies.
In the mid-1990s, governance was not a central concept in the development agenda. Teskey recalls being invited to join a newly formed Governance and Institutions Department at DFID, shifting from a more traditional economic role. His journey was influenced by pivotal works, including the World Bank’s 1997 World Development Report, which argued for the importance of state effectiveness, and Douglass North’s perspective on institutional roles in society.
A notable figure in his career was Clare Short, former Secretary of State at DFID, who drove the agency towards a more comprehensive development focus. Teskey emphasizes how individuals can catalyze transformation within institutions, even in complex bureaucratic settings.
Over his career, Teskey has distilled six core ideas that have shaped his understanding of governance, essential for fostering effective development. However, he expresses concerns regarding the current state of governance discourse, noting that intellectual leadership in the field has declined since the heyday of the World Bank’s guidance from 1995 to 2015. Institutional restructuring and cutbacks in development spending have created a vacuum in governance thinking.
He identifies three urgent actions necessary to revitalize governance discussions:
1. Reinforce the Role of the State**: It is vital to understand that the capabilities of a state correlate directly with its functions and governance effectiveness. Specific country contexts dictate the necessary governance structures and priorities.
2. Enhance Evidence Collection**: There is a pressing need for better synthesis of evidence relating to the impacts of aid and governance projects to counteract prevalent skepticism in locales such as Australia.
3. Revitalize Engagement with Academia**: Major development entities need to deepen collaborations with academic institutions to infuse innovation and robust discourse into governance practices.
Despite these concerns, Teskey finds hope in the commitment from current Australian leadership to restore aid capabilities and engage substantively with governance concepts. With ongoing discussions at institutions like the Australian National University, the potential for reinvigorated governance frameworks that address contemporary challenges remains optimistic.
This reflection not only highlights the challenges facing governance discourse but also brings attention to the resilient opportunities for collaboration, innovative thinking, and institutional rejuvenation in the realm of global development.
Leave a comment