The hearing concerning three motions filed by former Supervisor of Elections Mohammed Saneem began today in Suva, presided over by Magistrate Yogesh Prasad. The motions challenge the legitimacy of charges brought against him by the then-acting Director of Public Prosecutions, John Rabuku. Saneem’s legal arguments also highlight alleged violations of fundamental human rights and question the basis of the Electoral Act that empowered the Fijian Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) to pursue these charges.
Mr. Saneem is accused of unlawfully receiving a financial benefit totaling $55,944.03 as back pay from the former Attorney-General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. Legal representation for Saneem comes from well-known Suva attorney Devanesh Sharma, while the Acting DPP Nancy Tikoisuva represents the state in the proceedings.
Additionally, the prosecution’s attempt to consolidate charges against Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum, who faces separate allegations of abuse of office, has been postponed pending the outcome of Saneem’s motions. Magistrate Prasad indicated that a decision regarding the motions will be issued next month.
In summary, the case involving Mohammed Saneem raises critical questions about legal processes and rights within the political framework of Fiji. As the judiciary navigates these complex issues, the forthcoming ruling may play a significant role in shaping the regulatory landscape of electoral governance and accountability in the country.
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding due process and human rights, highlighting the vulnerabilities and challenges faced by individuals in positions of public trust. As the court prepares to make its ruling, there remains hope that the outcomes will contribute positively to the integrity of democratic institutions in Fiji.
Leave a comment