Fiji’s chief prosecutor, Christopher Pryde, who has been suspended, has alleged that the government secretly offered him NZ$150,000 to resign and evade an inquiry concerning his supposed misconduct. Pryde, 59, a New Zealander, declined the settlement and opted not to attend a recent hearing about the matter, claiming he lacked the financial resources to defend himself effectively.
Pryde accused the government of attempting to remove him as part of an “ethno-national agenda,” alleging that foreigners and Indo-Fijians are being marginalized in favor of indigenous Fijians. He expressed concerns about the hiring practices in Fiji, suggesting they prioritize ethnicity over merit.
Two months prior, the Judicial Services Committee (JSC) proposed an out-of-court settlement to Pryde, which would require him to resign immediately as the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and in return, he would not pursue any further legal actions against the JSC.
Despite considering resignation, Pryde stood firm in his belief that he had done no wrong and stated he would rather seek a formal declaration clearing his name than accept a “grubby payout.”
Pryde was initially appointed as DPP in November 2011 but was suspended in April 2023 after a conversation with former Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum became the basis for allegations of misconduct, as it was suggested he may have accessed sensitive police information. This situation has prompted additional scrutiny, as the Fiji Law Society expressed concerns about the inquiry process, particularly regarding fairness and representation, noting that Pryde had to withdraw legal representation due to loss of income during his suspension.
The tribunal overseeing the matter is expected to present its final recommendations to President Naiqama Lalabalavu by December 23. Pryde has indicated he anticipates being removed from his position, with Acting Chief Prosecutor Nancy Tikoisuva likely to take over.
As this situation unfolds, it raises significant questions about governance, representation, and procedural fairness in Fiji’s judicial processes. It can be noted that while challenges remain, the attention this case has garnered may lead to a greater emphasis on accountability and transparency within the Fijian government moving forward.
In summary, Christopher Pryde alleges that the Fijian government offered him a financial incentive to resign instead of facing an inquiry into his conduct, reflecting deep concerns over ethnic dynamics and governance practices in Fiji.
Leave a comment