Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu has voiced strong criticism regarding the government’s transparency and its reluctance to engage in meaningful discussions about proposed amendments to the 2013 Constitution. This comes in light of the recent defeat of the Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament, which fell just one vote short of the needed majority. Seruiratu has called for genuine dialogue that considers the viewpoints of all Fijians, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity beyond the government’s immediate circle.
Seruiratu expressed frustration over the government’s failure to specify which areas of the Constitution require amendments, a sentiment that has resonated with various community stakeholders. He pointed out that productive discussions cannot be achieved through sporadic communication but must involve direct, inclusive engagement that values the input of every citizen. His remarks were a response to Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica’s criticisms, which framed Seruiratu’s approach as indicative of weak leadership.
Contrary to this characterization, Seruiratu argued that a humble approach to dialogue is not a sign of weakness. He believes that a commitment to constructive conversations rooted in a genuine desire for compromise is essential, while still respecting core principles. In the ongoing discourse, Kamikamica has dismissed Seruiratu’s positions as reminiscent of past leaders who failed to fulfill their responsibilities in parliament. Nonetheless, Seruiratu contends that there must be serious engagement among all political factions to reach a consensus.
This situation echoes Seruiratu’s previous concerns about the need for transparency in political processes, particularly regarding allegations that the government may employ unethical tactics to garner support from Opposition members. Despite the prevailing tensions, there is hope that these ongoing discussions could be a stepping stone toward meaningful reforms, fostering a sense of responsible governance, and amplifying diverse voices within Fiji’s political arena.
Additionally, the exchanges between Seruiratu and Kamikamica hint at a mutual interest in narrowing the divide between the government and the opposition. Such conversations could lay the groundwork for a more cohesive approach to refining Fiji’s constitutional framework. There remains a sense of optimism that increased political engagement will help pave the way for reforms that genuinely resonate with the aspirations of the Fijian populace.
Leave a comment