Pressure is mounting on the Government, particularly on the Prime Minister, to promptly initiate an independent Board of Inquiry regarding the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as the new Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC).
Political commentators emphasize the necessity of this inquiry, despite potential costs and time commitments. The public in Fiji is eager for clarity and is closely observing the situation, according to Premila Kumar, the only female Member of Parliament from the Opposition.
Kumar pointed out that this isn’t the first instance of oversight by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), recalling last year’s appointment of John Rabuku as acting Director of Public Prosecutions, which was subsequently deemed invalid by the Supreme Court. She questioned why Malimali’s appointment was expedited when there were known investigations surrounding her.
Kumar stated that common sense suggests individuals under investigation should not be promoted to such high-ranking positions. Former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry expressed his concerns regarding the Coalition Government’s perceived negligence in handling the matter, even after Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka indicated a forthcoming inquiry.
Mosese Bulitavu, a crossbencher, praised Rabuka’s decision to pursue the inquiry, noting that the ongoing debate about FICAC is unfolding under Rabuka’s leadership, with some ministers, including the Attorney-General, publicly supporting Malimali’s appointment.
Bulitavu remarked that while FICAC is an independent body, the Prime Minister is often held accountable by the public whenever the commission is mentioned. He believes that a Board of Inquiry could help to resolve the entire situation.
Ms. Malimali was approached for comments but declined, stating she was unable to respond at the moment. Attempts to reach Attorney-General Graham Leung and the JSC for their input also went unanswered.