Fiji’s Justice at a Crossroads: Death Penalty Debate Heats Up

Opposition Member of Parliament Ketan Lal has condemned Minister for Women and Children Lynda Tabuya’s proposal to reintroduce the death penalty in Fiji, labeling it a setback for the country’s human rights and justice system.

Lal acknowledged the seriousness of drug trafficking and the need for robust legal frameworks to address it; however, he argued that advocating for the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional principles and international commitments. He emphasized that the Constitution guarantees the right to life and safeguards against cruel and degrading treatment.

Reinstating the death penalty, he argued, would violate these fundamental rights and undermine the foundations of Fiji’s justice system, which is committed to protecting human dignity and the rule of law. Lal highlighted that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty reflects its dedication to human rights on a global scale. He warned that any move to reinstate such a severe measure would be regressive and detrimental to the nation’s international reputation and moral standing.

The Opposition MP called for a focus on enhancing the justice system, improving law enforcement capabilities, and investing in rehabilitation and prevention programs to tackle the underlying issues associated with drug trafficking, rather than resorting to the death penalty.

Lal expressed disappointment that the Minister for Women and Children is advocating for extreme measures, reminding society of its responsibility to support victims of crimes like rape, which cause lifelong trauma. He argued for life sentences for rapists and the need for legal reforms that ensure justice for survivors.

He urged that energy and resources should be dedicated to protecting the lives and rights of the most vulnerable, rather than pursuing the death penalty. “While the fight against drug trafficking is vital, it must align with our constitutional values and human rights commitments. We should not allow fear to lead us to adopt unconstitutional and ineffective measures,” Lal concluded.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website