The Commission of Inquiry (COI) has responded firmly to a statement from the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), which suggested that the COI may be influenced by external pressures. The COI asserts that FICAC’s comments are an attempt by Commissioner Barbara Malimali to silence negative commentary from various stakeholders, including the media, regarding her performance.
The COI emphasized its commitment to conducting its operations with strict adherence to principles of natural justice and made clear that it is not susceptible to external pressures, as implied by FICAC. They also highlighted the importance of media freedom in a modern constitutional democracy, stating that the existence of a COI should not be construed as a threat to this freedom.
Furthermore, the COI pointed out that it had not been consulted by FICAC before the latter’s statement was made public. In response, FICAC called on the public to respect the integrity of the COI’s inquiries, particularly regarding the appointment processes related to Malimali, urging that due process be allowed to proceed without interference.
When approached for comments on the developing situation, Prime Minister Rabuka declined to address the matter concerning FICAC.
This situation highlights the dynamic relationship between oversight agencies and the media in Fiji, emphasizing the need for both to function independently yet collaboratively in pursuit of transparency and accountability. While tensions may arise, this could potentially serve as an opportunity for both FICAC and the COI to reaffirm their roles and responsibilities in improving governance within the country.
Summary: The COI has rejected claims of external pressure from FICAC concerning its operations and underscored its commitment to integrity and freedom of the press. FICAC has requested public support to allow the COI to conduct its inquiries without interference. The Prime Minister has chosen not to comment on the unfolding controversy.
Leave a comment