Fiji’s Human Rights at Risk: The Death Penalty Debate Intensifies

Opposition Member of Parliament Ketan Lal has criticized Minister for Women and Children Lynda Tabuya’s call to reinstate the death penalty in Fiji, describing it as a regressive move for the country’s human rights and legal system. Lal acknowledged the seriousness of drug trafficking but argued that proposing the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional values and its international commitments.

He pointed out that the Constitution guarantees the right to life and protection from cruel treatment, emphasizing that reinstating the death penalty would violate these essential rights and undermine the foundation of Fiji’s justice system, which is built on human dignity and the rule of law.

Lal stressed that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty reflects the nation’s commitment to human rights worldwide. He argued that reinstating such a penalty would harm Fiji’s international reputation and moral standing.

The MP urged the focus to shift away from punitive measures and toward enhancing the justice system, improving law enforcement, and investing in rehabilitation and prevention strategies. He expressed disappointment in the Minister’s extreme stance, underscoring the need for society to confront heinous crimes, particularly rape, which he described as devastating and deserving serious attention.

Lal advocated for life sentences for rapists and called for legal reforms to ensure justice for survivors of sexual violence. He emphasized that resources should be directed toward protecting the rights of victims rather than towards reintroducing the death penalty.

In conclusion, he asserted that while efforts against drug trafficking should remain vigorous, they must align with constitutional values and a commitment to human rights, warning against allowing fear to lead to unconstitutional and ineffective measures.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website