A scholar from the University of the South Pacific (USP) argues that amnesty should not be granted to individuals involved in political activities that threaten stability in Fiji. Rajendra Prasad made these comments during a public lecture, highlighting that past amnesties were given to those responsible for political unrest from 1987 until the 2013 Constitution was enacted.
Mr. Prasad expressed optimism about the reconciliation process, emphasizing that amnesty and similar measures have been integral to previous and the current constitutions. He stated, “I don’t believe anyone or any appointed truth commission can operate outside the Constitution.” He emphasized the importance of moving forward with a commitment to “never again,” underscoring the need for a focused approach to prevent future instability.
Reflecting on Fiji’s turbulent history, Mr. Prasad noted that the nation has endured significant challenges. He pointed out that previous attempts at resolution, such as the Constitutional Commission, fell short. The 1990 Constitution, imposed by a military regime, was particularly criticized for its racially divisive nature, followed by the somewhat flawed 1997 Constitution.
Mr. Prasad observed that while amnesty has been granted until the establishment of the 2013 Constitution, it is crucial that future Truth and Reconciliation Commissions establish a clear stance against amnesty for those participating in destabilizing political activities. He warned against reopening old wounds and called for a collective effort to move forward as a nation. He emphasized the importance of effectively communicating the commission’s framework, its powers, and the pathway ahead to all citizens of Fiji.