The recent appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has drawn criticism from Senior Opposition Member of Parliament Jone Usamate, who described it as inappropriate. Usamate expressed that, while he supports the advancement of women to significant roles, the current situation raises concerns regarding transparency and accountability. He noted that principles of good governance seem to have been overlooked in this instance.
Usamate highlighted the importance of the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC), which is supposed to rely on an independent team to examine applications meticulously, ensuring the selection of the most suitable candidates. He questioned whether the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) had employed such a review process for Malimali’s appointment.
He emphasized the JSC’s responsibility in upholding public trust in independent institutions, even if it conflicts with their own interests. While acknowledging Malimali’s qualifications, as supported by Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo who stated she achieved the highest score of 141, Usamate raised concerns about due diligence performed by the Office of the President in vetting her for the role.
Usamate pointed out that there are questions surrounding her past, specifically an ongoing investigation, which should have led to the postponement of her appointment. He sought clarity on whether the COC had received a resignation letter from her after serving as chair of the Electoral Commission and questioned the legitimacy of her intentions regarding her notice period to resign.
He also called for transparency regarding instructions given to then Acting Deputy Commissioner Francis Puleiwai not to file charges against Biman Prasad, deeming it a serious misuse of authority that necessitates an independent investigation, potentially by the Police.
Usamate reiterated that good governance should be the cornerstone of a robust and efficient government. He criticized recent remarks from the Minister of Justice, who referred to investigations of Cabinet Ministers as “acts of malice,” questioning the implications of such a statement on fairness and equality in governance.