The pressure is mounting on the Government, particularly on the Prime Minister, to swiftly set up an independent Board of Inquiry regarding the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as the new Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC).
Political analysts emphasize that despite the potential costs and time involved, such an inquiry is necessary. Premila Kumar, the only female member of the Opposition in Parliament, stated that the citizens of Fiji are seeking clarity and closely monitoring the situation.
Kumar noted that this incident is not the first misstep by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), recalling last year’s appointment of John Rabuku as acting Director of Public Prosecutions, who was later deemed ineligible by the Supreme Court. She questioned the rushed nature of Malimali’s appointment, especially given the ongoing investigation against her.
“Common sense suggests that someone under investigation should not be elevated to such a significant position,” Kumar remarked.
Former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry expressed concern over what he perceives as the Coalition Government’s lax approach toward the issue, despite Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s indication of pursuing a Board of Inquiry.
G9 crossbencher Mosese Bulitavu applauded Mr. Rabuka’s commitment to establishing the Board of Inquiry. He remarked that the ongoing discussions surrounding FICAC are happening under the Prime Minister’s leadership, with some ministers, including the Attorney-General, defending Malimali’s appointment.
Bulitavu stressed that FICAC operates independently, yet whenever it is mentioned, the Prime Minister as the head of Government is often blamed. He believes that a Board of Inquiry would bring closure to the matter.
Attempts to reach Ms. Malimali for her comments yielded no results, as she declined to answer questions. Efforts to contact Attorney-General Graham Leung and the JSC also went unanswered.