The government, particularly the Prime Minister, is facing pressure to promptly establish an independent Board of Inquiry regarding the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as the new Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC).
Political analysts argue that, despite the potential costs and time involved, such an inquiry is necessary to provide clarity to the public. Opposition MP Premila Kumar highlighted that the citizens of Fiji deserve answers and are closely observing the situation. She pointed out that this is not the first instance where the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) has made a questionable decision, citing last year’s appointment of John Rabuku as acting Director of Public Prosecutions, which was later deemed invalid by the Supreme Court.
Ms. Kumar questioned the urgency behind Malimali’s appointment, especially given the ongoing investigations against her. She stated that it is illogical for someone under scrutiny to be promoted to a significant position.
Although Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has indicated plans for the Board of Inquiry, former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry expressed concern about the Coalition Government’s apparent negligence in addressing this matter.
Crossbench MP Mosese Bulitavu praised Rabuka’s decision to initiate the inquiry, emphasizing that the ongoing discussion surrounding FICAC occurs under the Prime Minister’s leadership, despite FICAC’s independence. He noted that the Prime Minister is often blamed in public discourse when FICAC is mentioned, regardless of its independent status. Bulitavu believes that a Board of Inquiry could help resolve the situation definitively.
When contacted for comment, Ms. Malimali stated, “I’m sorry, I actually don’t have anything to say right now, I’m sorry, I can’t answer any questions right now, I have to go.” Attempts to reach Attorney-General Graham Leung and the JSC for comments were unsuccessful.