Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection Lynda Tabuya’s proposal to impose the death penalty for large-scale drug traffickers has sparked controversy. Ketan Lal, the Shadow Minister for Justice representing the Group of 16 (G16), argued that Fiji should focus on advocating for life sentences for rapists and enacting laws that ensure justice for survivors rather than calling for capital punishment.
Lal expressed disappointment that Tabuya, who oversees issues pertaining to women and children, would support such a severe measure. He emphasized that her role should prioritize the protection and empowerment of society’s most vulnerable, particularly victims of severe crimes such as rape. He described rape as a life-altering crime that inflicts lasting trauma and stated that it necessitates a serious response.
He urged that Fiji’s efforts should be directed towards building a legal framework that guarantees prompt and certain justice for victims of sexual violence while safeguarding everyone’s rights. Lal emphasized that resources should be allocated to support those who have suffered rather than considering the reintroduction of the death penalty.
While acknowledging the seriousness of drug trafficking, Lal insisted that any counteractions must align with Fiji’s constitutional standards and human rights commitments. He cautioned against allowing fear to guide the adoption of measures that may be unconstitutional and ineffective, advocating instead for the strengthening of laws against crimes like rape to ensure justice for victims.
Lal also pointed out that suggesting the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional principles and international commitments, especially the right to life and protection from cruel punishment as enshrined in the Constitution. He highlighted that reinstating the death penalty would undermine fundamental rights and the integrity of the justice system, which is founded on human dignity and the rule of law. Furthermore, he noted that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty reflects the nation’s commitment to human rights on a global level, asserting that any move to reintroduce such a severe measure would be a regressive step that could diminish Fiji’s international standing and moral credibility.