Opposition Member of Parliament Ketan Lal has criticized Minister for Women and Children Lynda Tabuya’s call for reintroducing the death penalty, labeling it a regression for Fiji’s human rights and justice system.
Lal acknowledged the severity of drug trafficking as a crime that warrants strong legal responses but argued that implementing the death sentence contradicts constitutional principles and international obligations. He emphasized that the Constitution guarantees the right to life and protection against cruel and degrading treatment, particularly in Sections 8 and 11.
He pointed out that reintroducing the death penalty would not only infringe on fundamental rights but also undermine the justice system, which is based on human dignity and the rule of law. Lal stated that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty demonstrates the nation’s commitment to human rights globally. He warned that any move to reinstate such measures would harm Fiji’s international reputation and moral standing.
The Opposition MP urged Fiji to resist the temptation of quick fixes that provide only an illusion of safety. Instead, he advocated for enhancing the justice system, improving law enforcement, and investing in rehabilitation and prevention tactics to address the root causes of drug trafficking.
Lal expressed disappointment that the Minister for Women and Children would support such an extreme measure, arguing that society must also focus on addressing crimes like rape, which deeply impact victims. He stressed that these heinous crimes require serious attention and appropriate responses.
He proposed advocating for life sentences for rapists and enacting laws that provide justice for survivors. Lal asserted that resources should be directed toward ensuring swift justice for victims of sexual violence while upholding the rights of all individuals, rather than pushing for the death penalty.
“While we must vigorously combat drug trafficking, it should be done in accordance with our Constitution and human rights commitments. We should not allow fear to lead us to adopt unconstitutional and ineffective measures,” Lal concluded.