Opposition Member of Parliament Ketan Lal has criticized Minister for Women and Children Lynda Tabuya’s call for the reintroduction of the death penalty, arguing that it represents a significant regression for Fiji’s human rights and justice system. Lal acknowledged the seriousness of drug trafficking but asserted that proposing capital punishment contradicts the nation’s constitutional principles and international commitments.
He pointed out that the Fijian Constitution, particularly Sections 8 and 11, guarantees the right to life and prohibits cruel and degrading treatment. According to Lal, reinstating the death penalty would violate these core rights and undermine the foundational principles of the justice system, which prioritizes human dignity and the rule of law.
Lal further emphasized that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty reflects the country’s commitment to human rights globally. He warned that any attempt to reinstate such a harsh measure would not only be regressive but also damage Fiji’s international reputation and moral authority.
The Opposition MP stressed the importance of not being tempted by quick solutions that provide only an illusion of safety. Instead, he advocated for a focus on strengthening the justice system, enhancing law enforcement capabilities, and investing in rehabilitation and prevention strategies to address the underlying causes of drug trafficking.
Expressing disappointment in the Minister’s extreme stance, Lal mentioned the critical need to address heinous crimes like rape, which have devastating lifelong impacts. He argued that life sentences for rapists and laws ensuring justice for survivors should be prioritized.
Lal urged that efforts should concentrate on creating a legal framework that guarantees prompt and certain justice for victims of sexual violence while safeguarding the rights of all individuals. He concluded by reiterating that the battle against drug trafficking must be conducted within the framework of the Constitution and a commitment to human rights, cautioning against allowing fear to drive unconstitutionally ineffective responses.