Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection, Lynda Tabuya’s proposal for the death penalty for major drug traffickers has sparked significant backlash. Ketan Lal, Shadow Minister for Justice representing the Group of 16 (G16), criticized the suggestion, arguing that Fiji should prioritize life sentences for rapists and advocate for laws that better serve survivors instead of considering capital punishment.
Lal expressed disappointment that Tabuya, who is responsible for issues related to women and children, would support such a severe measure. He emphasized that her office’s focus should be on protecting and empowering vulnerable individuals, particularly victims of grave offenses like rape. “Rape is a crime that destructively impacts lives and often leaves lifelong scars,” he stated, underscoring the need for a response that acknowledges its seriousness.
He called for a legal framework that ensures prompt and fair justice for victims of sexual violence, while safeguarding the rights of all citizens. “Our efforts and resources should be aimed at defending the lives and rights of those who have endured such trauma, not on reinstating the death penalty,” Lal noted.
Emphasizing the need for a balanced approach, Lal argued that addressing drug trafficking should be done in accordance with constitutional norms and human rights commitments. He cautioned against letting fear lead to unconstitutional and ineffective solutions, urging a focus on enhancing laws against sexual crimes and ensuring justice for all.
While recognizing the gravity of drug trafficking, Lal condemned the death penalty as contradictory to Fiji’s constitutional values and international obligations. He referred to Article 8 of Fiji’s Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and protection against cruel treatment. Reinstating capital punishment, he argued, would violate fundamental human rights and compromise the integrity of Fiji’s justice system.
Moreover, he stressed that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty reflects the nation’s commitment to human rights on the global stage. Lal warned that any attempt to reintroduce such a severe measure would be a regressive step, damaging Fiji’s international reputation and moral authority.