Fiji’s Death Penalty Debate: A Call for Justice or a Step Backward?

Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection Lynda Tabuya’s suggestion to impose the death penalty for major drug traffickers has faced criticism. Shadow Minister for Justice from the Group of 16 (G16), Ketan Lal, emphasized that Fiji should focus on life sentences for rapists and prioritize laws that ensure justice for survivors rather than advocating for capital punishment.

Lal expressed his disappointment that Tabuya, who is responsible for advocating for the welfare of women and children, supports such a severe measure. He underscored the importance of her role in protecting the vulnerable, including victims of grave offenses like rape. He described rape as a devastating crime that inflicts lifelong trauma and should command serious attention and remedial action.

Lal called for a legal structure that delivers swift and reliable justice for victims of sexual violence while safeguarding the rights of all individuals involved. He stated that resources should be directed towards protecting the lives and rights of those most affected rather than reinstating the death penalty.

While acknowledging the need for concerted efforts against drug trafficking, Lal insisted that such actions must be in accordance with the Constitution and respect for human rights. He cautioned against allowing fear to lead to the adoption of unconstitutional and ineffective measures, advocating instead for stronger laws against crimes such as rape to ensure justice and uphold the rights of all Fijians.

In addressing international concerns, Lal noted that drug trafficking is indeed a serious offense that warrants strong legal responses. However, he argued that proposing the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional values and international commitments, particularly referencing Article 8 of Fiji’s Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and protection from cruel treatment.

He warned that reinstating the death penalty would breach fundamental rights and compromise the integrity of Fiji’s justice system, which is built on the principles of human dignity and the rule of law. Moreover, he highlighted that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty showcases the nation’s dedication to human rights globally. Lal concluded that any attempt to reinstate such a harsh penalty would regressive, undermining Fiji’s international reputation and moral standing.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website