The suggestion made by Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection Lynda Tabuya to impose the death penalty for large-scale drug trafficking has sparked controversy. Ketan Lal, the Shadow Minister for Justice representing the Group of 16 (G16), criticized this approach, arguing that Fiji should prioritize life sentences for rapists and advocate for laws that bring justice to survivors rather than calling for capital punishment.
Lal expressed disappointment that Tabuya, who is responsible for the welfare of women, children, and social protection, would endorse such a severe measure. He emphasized that her role should focus on protecting and empowering vulnerable individuals, especially those affected by serious crimes like rape. “Rape devastates lives and often leaves lifelong scars,” he stated, stressing the need for appropriate responses to such violent offenses.
He underscored that rape is one of the most egregious crimes and requires serious attention and a legal framework that ensures swift and definitive justice for victims of sexual violence while safeguarding the rights of all individuals. Lal asserted that resources and efforts should be directed toward supporting victims and enhancing laws against sexual violence rather than considering the resurrection of the death penalty.
He acknowledged that while the fight against drug trafficking is vital, it must occur within the framework of the Constitution and commitment to human rights. Lal cautioned against letting fear prompt the adoption of unconstitutional and ineffective measures, advocating instead for justice for all Fijians.
Lal also highlighted that, although drug trafficking is a major issue that necessitates strong legal action, proposing the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional values and international commitments. He referenced Article 8 of Fiji’s Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and protection against cruel and degrading treatment. Lal argued that reinstating the death penalty would infringe on these fundamental rights, weaken the justice system, and oppose the country’s dedication to human rights on the global stage. He warned that any move toward reintroducing such a harsh measure would regress Fiji’s international reputation and moral authority.