Pressure is mounting on the Government, particularly on the Prime Minister, to promptly establish an independent Board of Inquiry regarding the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as the new Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC).
Political analysts assert that while the inquiry may be both costly and time-consuming, it is necessary. The citizens of Fiji are seeking clarity and are closely monitoring the situation, according to Opposition MP Premila Kumar, who is noted for her vocal stance in Parliament.
Kumar pointed out that this situation is not unprecedented, recalling that the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) previously appointed John Rabuku as the acting Director of Public Prosecutions, only for the Supreme Court to later determine his ineligibility.
“Why was Malimali’s appointment expedited, especially given that she is under investigation?” Kumar questioned. She emphasized that it is illogical for someone facing scrutiny to be promoted to such a significant position.
Former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry expressed concern over the Coalition Government’s lax approach to this matter, despite PM Sitiveni Rabuka announcing intentions to form a Board of Inquiry.
Mosese Bulitavu, a G9 crossbencher, praised Rabuka’s decision to initiate the inquiry. “This ongoing FICAC debate unfolds under his leadership, and several ministers, including the Attorney-General, have publicly defended Malimali’s appointment,” Bulitavu noted. He remarked that while FICAC operates independently of the Prime Minister, the head of Government is often held accountable when issues arise.
Bulitavu believes a Board of Inquiry would resolve the ongoing controversy. Malimali was approached for a comment but declined, stating, “I’m sorry, I actually don’t have anything to say right now, I have to go.” Attempts to reach Attorney-General Graham Leung and the JSC for comments were unsuccessful.