The call by Lynda Tabuya, the Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection, for the reintroduction of the death penalty for large-scale drug trafficking has sparked criticism. Ketan Lal, the Shadow Minister for Justice from the Group of 16 (G16), argued that Fiji should prioritize life sentences for rapists and advocate for justice for survivors, rather than seeking extreme measures like the death penalty.
Mr. Lal expressed his disappointment in Ms. Tabuya’s stance, noting that her role should focus on protecting and empowering society’s most vulnerable, including survivors of severe crimes such as rape. He emphasized that rape is a devastating crime with lifelong effects on victims.
He highlighted the need for a legal framework that guarantees prompt and reliable justice for victims of sexual violence while respecting the rights of all individuals. He believes resources should be dedicated to defending the rights and lives of those most affected rather than considering the death penalty.
Mr. Lal maintained that while tackling drug trafficking is crucial, it must align with constitutional values and human rights commitments. He warned against adopting measures driven by fear that could be unconstitutional and ineffective. He urged a focus on enhancing laws related to crimes like rape to ensure justice is achieved for victims and the rights of all Fijians are upheld.
He acknowledged drug trafficking as a grave offense needing strong legal action, but proposed the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional values and international responsibilities. He pointed to Article 8 of the Fiji Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and protection from cruel treatment, arguing that reinstating the death penalty would undermine these rights and damage Fiji’s justice system, which is built on human dignity and rule of law.
Mr. Lal concluded that Fiji’s adherence to international agreements opposing the death penalty reflects its commitment to human rights worldwide. He cautioned that any move to reinstate such a harsh punishment would be a backward step, harming Fiji’s international reputation and moral standing.