Pita Nacuva, the former Speaker of the House in Fiji, has reaffirmed his stance that the 1997 Constitution remains the country’s supreme law. Following his ousting from office in 2006, Nacuva stressed that the Constitution has not been invalidated through any legal challenge. He pointed to the Court of Appeal’s ruling from April 9, 2009, which addressed the legitimacy of several challenges against the military-led government’s actions. Nacuva emphasized that this decision remains in force, noting that a party dissatisfied with an appellate ruling is expected to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court.
However, the abrogation of the Constitution by the President on April 10, 2009, has complicated the legal situation in Fiji. Nacuva highlighted that the government’s decision not to pursue the Supreme Court route after the Court of Appeal’s decision was a pivotal moment in Fiji’s constitutional journey.
Discussions regarding constitutional reform have recently gained traction within Fiji’s political environment. At the Attorney-General’s Conference, constitutional lawyer Jon Apted addressed the intricate struggles associated with reverting to earlier constitutions. He recognized the increasing willingness to consider constitutional reform, yet pointed out the considerable logistical challenges that would accompany any efforts.
This evolving dialogue surrounding the 1997 Constitution presents a hopeful opportunity for Fiji’s governance. It signals a potential shift towards a political framework that is more responsive to the needs of the populace. The engagement of prominent legal and political figures indicates an emerging collective commitment to fostering a more active civic discourse about Fiji’s constitutional future. This process could pave the way for meaningful reforms that reflect contemporary societal needs and desires, making it a promising time for constitutional consideration in the nation.
Leave a comment