The Commission of Inquiry (COI) has criticized a statement made by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), which suggested that the COI is vulnerable to outside pressure. The COI argued that FICAC’s remarks, attributed to Commissioner Barbara Malimali, seem aimed at silencing negative commentary from various stakeholders, including the media, regarding her conduct.
In its statement, the COI firmly asserted that it remains steadfast against any external influences. It emphasized its commitment to adhering to the principles of natural justice in its operations. Furthermore, the COI highlighted that, as a body operating within a modern constitutional democracy, it must not be perceived as undermining media freedom.
The COI also pointed out that it was not consulted by FICAC prior to the release of its statement. On the same day, FICAC had issued its own statement urging the public to allow the COI to carry out its inquiries into the process surrounding the appointment of Commissioner Malimali without interference, stressing the need for due process.
When questioned by the media regarding the ongoing situation, Prime Minister Rabuka chose not to comment on the FICAC matter.
This incident reveals the complexities surrounding governance and accountability in Fiji, highlighting the need for communication and transparency among institutions. It is essential that each entity respects the responsibilities of the others to maintain public trust.
In summary, the exchange between the COI and FICAC illustrates the delicate balance between administrative processes and public scrutiny, a vital component of any democratic system. Moving forward, fostering mutual respect and open dialogue will be crucial in addressing concerns and ensuring effective governance in Fiji.
Leave a comment