Opposition MP Premila Kumar has sharply criticized Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent decision to expand the cabinet, calling it a “sham reshuffle.” Kumar expressed her disappointment that instead of holding underperforming ministers accountable, Rabuka appointed seven new ministers and assistant ministers, which she argues merely reinforces the existing inefficiencies within the government.

According to Kumar, this cabinet expansion serves as a “bailout” for ineffective leaders who continue to enjoy their benefits at the expense of the hardworking Fijians. She stressed, “This isn’t a reshuffle. It’s a bailout for underperforming ministers and assistant ministers who continue to hold their positions.” By maintaining the status quo rather than redistributing roles or moving ineffective leaders out of their positions, she believes the Prime Minister has betrayed public trust and neglected the real needs of the people.

The cabinet has now swelled to a total of 34 members, which includes 22 Cabinet Ministers and 12 Assistant Ministers, marking one of the largest cabinets in Fiji’s history. Kumar criticized this significant expansion, pointing out that it goes against promises made by Rabuka and Deputy Prime Minister to reduce the size of government and cut unnecessary expenditures. This increase raises concerns about the government’s ability to effectively tackle mounting challenges such as poverty, infrastructure decline, and rising living costs.

Kumar’s concerns are shared by other political figures, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, who labeled the cabinet enlargement as irresponsible, asserting that it places additional financial burdens on taxpayers and detracts from addressing the urgent public service needs.

Despite these harsh criticisms, there is a sense of hope that ongoing discussions around governance and accountability may inspire the government to rethink its strategies. Advocates for reform express optimism that strengthening communication between the administration and its citizens could enhance service delivery and restore public trust.

In summary, while the reshuffle has drawn significant backlash regarding accountability in governance, it also presents a crucial opportunity for the government to reassess its priorities and potentially realign more closely with the aspirations and needs of the Fijian populace. The hope is that through robust dialogue and advocacy for reform, a more engaged leadership can emerge, leading to improvements in public service and a stronger relationship with citizens.