The president of the Fijian Teachers Association (FTA), Netani Druavesi, has ignited a heated discussion by suggesting the reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools. This proposal has drawn criticism from various community leaders, including Nilesh Lal, the executive director of Dialogue Fiji, who characterized it as a troubling regression for society.
Lal argues that corporal punishment equates to child abuse and poses significant risks to a child’s well-being. He highlights the incongruity of promoting a loving home environment only to expose children to physical punishment in educational settings. Lal states that only the most unfeeling parents would tolerate such treatment from educators.
Research supports Lal’s stance, indicating that corporal punishment is ineffective and exacerbates societal violence by normalizing aggressive behavior. He points out that children subjected to physical punishment are more likely to exhibit major behavioral issues, face academic challenges, and experience mental health and relational difficulties in the long run.
Amid concerns regarding child safety in Fiji, with alarming rates of abuse reported, Lal’s assertions resonate strongly. Data from the Assistant Minister for Women, Children, and Social Protection, Sashi Kiran, indicates that five of every six children in Fiji face some form of abuse or neglect. Additionally, the Fiji Police have documented 324 instances of child sexual abuse in just the first half of the year, raising significant alarms about the state of child protection.
In response to Druavesi’s comments, Pravesh Sharma, chairperson of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission, condemned the push for corporal punishment, declaring it both unconstitutional and unlawful. He emphasized that such measures violate children’s rights to a safe and supportive educational environment, in line with Fiji’s commitments under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
While the revival of corporal punishment is framed as a potentially damaging suggestion, the ongoing debate highlights an increasing awareness and advocacy for children’s rights, providing an opportunity for the community to regroup and strengthen non-violent disciplinary measures in educational settings. Rather than embracing outdated practices, Fiji can lead in reinforcing a culture that reflects compassion and respect for young learners.
In summary, the call for corporal punishment has sparked a crucial discussion about child safety and rights in Fiji. Many advocate for alternative approaches that enhance educational outcomes without compromising student well-being. This situation presents a chance for society to evolve towards a more compassionate and supportive approach to discipline in schools.
Leave a comment