The Fiji Law Society has called for Janet Mason, who is currently serving as counsel assisting the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into Barbara Malimali’s appointment as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), to step aside. The Society contends that her continued involvement could undermine public confidence in the inquiry’s integrity. However, it clarified that it is not advocating for her outright removal but believes that stepping aside is a prudent measure until her ongoing professional conduct issues are resolved.

Mason is facing scrutiny following a misconduct finding by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal, a decision she has appealed. Additionally, serious allegations concerning her application for a Fiji practicing certificate have emerged, prompting concerns about the handling of her case by the Legal Practitioners Unit.

The Fiji Law Society underscored the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism and integrity among all participants involved in the inquiry. Given that the COI is investigating the legality and propriety of Malimali’s appointment, it is critical that all individuals involved are perceived to have integrity beyond reproach to maintain public trust in the COI’s processes.

In response, Mason has expressed her dissatisfaction with the Fiji Law Society’s actions, alleging that they are attempting to undermine her position. She has filed a police report regarding allegations of document tampering related to her practicing certificate application, asserting her qualifications and integrity as a legal practitioner.

As the inquiry progresses, there is a hopeful outlook that it will not only clarify the specific allegations surrounding Malimali’s appointment but also foster much-needed reforms that strengthen accountability and transparency within Fiji’s governance practices. This situation marks a critical moment for enhancing ethical standards across Fiji’s political and legal systems, with the potential to restore public trust in its institutions.

In summary, while challenges persist regarding Mason’s role in the inquiry, the ongoing investigation presents an opportunity for significant reform in governance and the enforcement of ethical practices within Fiji’s political landscape. As stakeholders remain optimistic, the expectation is that the findings from this inquiry will catalyze the necessary changes for a more accountable and transparent governance structure in Fiji.