The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has emphasized its dedication to maintaining impartiality and making decisions based on evidence, ensuring the public that all investigations are carried out without bias or fear. This reaffirmation comes in response to comments made by Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu concerning allegations against former Minister for Women, Lynda Tabuya.

FICAC clarified that it received a complaint from the Supervisor of Elections on April 5, 2024, alleging that Ms. Tabuya failed to declare her spouse’s income and business interests, as required by law. An investigation was initiated under the authority of former Acting Deputy Commissioner Ms. Francis Puleiwai on April 24, 2024, which ultimately confirmed that Ms. Tabuya’s marriage to Mr. Robert Semaan had been legally dissolved in December 2016. Following this, a recommendation to close the case was made on August 5, 2024, and the file was formally closed by Ms. Puleiwai on August 12, 2024. The Supervisor of Elections was notified of the closure on September 20, 2024.

Additionally, FICAC stated that neither party in the divorce case was represented by current Commissioner Ms. Barbara Malimali while she was in private practice. Seruiratu expressed concerns about Ms. Malimali’s role and suggested potential influence from Ms. Tabuya regarding the case closure. The Commission responded firmly, disputing his claims and highlighting that the actions taken in relation to Ms. Tabuya’s case occurred prior to Malimali’s appointment as Commissioner.

FICAC urged individuals, especially those in influential positions, to be cautious and verify information before making public statements regarding the Commission’s operations.

This situation highlights the critical importance of integrity and transparency in governance. FICAC’s commitment to unbiased investigations helps foster public trust in the institution’s ability to uphold the law and address corruption effectively. As discussions around accountability continue, it opens up opportunities for constructive dialogue on the standards expected from public officials and the mechanisms in place to address any potential misconduct.