The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has been given a clear directive to submit requested disclosures within 21 days in relation to the case of Sarika Devi Raj, a former military finance officer. The warning, issued by Suva Magistrate Pulekeria Low, states that a fine of $300 will be imposed if FICAC fails to meet this deadline.
The delay in disclosing necessary documentation was attributed by FICAC lawyer Lillian Mausio to the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), which has not provided the essential documents needed for compilation. Sarika Devi Raj is facing two counts of abuse of office stemming from incidents that allegedly occurred between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. She is accused of not declaring her ownership of Maleka Investment, an active vendor for the RFMF, and is alleged to have benefited $182,404.99 from this oversight.
The defence attorney, Mohammed Saneem, expressed concerns regarding the ongoing delays, stating that they infringe upon Ms. Raj’s constitutional right to a fair trial. Additionally, Ms. Raj has requested a modification of her bail conditions to eliminate the requirement to report to the FICAC office. Ms. Mausio argued that the application lacked proper filing and didn’t present a valid justification for the proposed change.
Saneem contended that FICAC does not possess the authority to set bail conditions and emphasized that his client has consistently attended court hearings without fail. The magistrate is expected to announce a decision regarding the requested change in bail conditions today.
This case underlines the importance of transparency and accountability in public service, emphasizing the legal system’s commitment to ensuring that justice is served in a timely manner. As the court awaits decisions regarding bail conditions, it reflects the ongoing efforts to uphold fair trial rights while dealing with serious allegations of misconduct.
In summary, the financial implications facing FICAC due to delayed disclosures signal the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings and protecting individuals’ rights within the system.
Leave a comment