Attorney-General Graham Leung has strongly defended the Government’s stance on the Constitutional Amendment Bill, asserting that the recent parliamentary discussions exemplified democracy at work. He stated that the healthy exchange of opinions allowed Members of Parliament (MPs) to express their views on significant constitutional matters.
Leung highlighted the importance of ensuring any constitutional amendments are rooted in public involvement, urging that civil society and the youth should have a voice in the process. He reassured citizens that the foundational democratic values of equal rights and human dignity would remain intact and that the Government has no intention of undermining these principles.
The Attorney-General noted that the Cabinet is preparing to refer parts of the Constitution to the Supreme Court for clarification regarding their legality, due to claims that some provisions may conflict with constitutional requirements. He mentioned that this action is expected to occur shortly, and the Chief Justice will determine the assembly of judges and the court’s schedule.
Rejecting allegations that the Government has acted outside constitutional norms with the Amendment Bill, Leung pointed out that the bill’s successful introduction and first reading was a significant achievement, especially given opposition claims of it being out of order. He emphasized that all actions were compliant with the law, having received the Speaker’s approval.
Leung mentioned that the current supermajority requirement for constitutional changes has been deemed too inflexible, prompting the government to explore alternative legal avenues should the Supreme Court reject the proposed amendments. He stressed the importance of allowing the court time to fulfill its constitutional duties without preempting its decision.
This discourse about constitutional amendments is reflective of earlier statements made by Leung, which emphasized the necessity for a living constitution that evolves with societal needs. The ongoing discussions indicate a commitment to thorough deliberation and engagement with diverse political and civic perspectives—a hopeful sign that continued dialogue may lead to constructive reforms in governance. The government’s approach could pave the way for a more representative and adaptive constitutional framework, ultimately aligning with the aspirations of the people.
Leave a comment