Fiji News From Around The World

Court Drama: Stem Cell Procedure Dispute in Fiji’s High-Profile Case

Spread the love

The lawyer representing Daniel Whippy, the managing director of Carpenters Fiji Limited, has dismissed the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) lawyer’s claims as “hogwash.” This remark arose during a court appearance where Whippy is facing charges of abuse of office. He is seeking to modify his bail conditions to allow for travel to the United States for stem cell treatment for his knee.

In court, FICAC lawyer Sera Fatafehi referenced two affidavits opposing Whippy’s request, one from a FICAC Investigation Officer and the other from Dr. Alvin De Asa, an orthopedic surgeon at Nasese Private Hospital. Fatafehi contended that treatment options were available locally, and Dr. De Asa provided a second opinion affirming that local treatment could meet Whippy’s needs.

Whippy’s attorney, Suruj Sharma, countered that the affidavits did not address the specifics of the stem cell procedure, asserting it was a complex treatment exclusive to the U.S. He noted that the procedure’s invasiveness warranted special consideration, and FICAC had not substantiated their claims.

The court, presided over by Magistrate Sufia Hamza, criticized FICAC for not being prepared with the necessary affidavits, acknowledging the specialized nature of the treatment. Although Fatafehi expressed difficulties in locating a local specialist, she mentioned a potential surgeon who could provide a statement soon.

As the situation unfolds, Whippy’s legal team emphasizes his ongoing physical suffering and the urgency of addressing his medical condition. A deadline has been set for FICAC to submit their affidavits by Thursday, with the hearing scheduled for November 6.

This case highlights the intersection of legal proceedings and medical needs, raising important questions about access to specialized healthcare options in Fiji. Regardless of the outcome, it serves as a crucial reminder of the challenges individuals face in navigating judicial processes while addressing urgent health matters. The upcoming hearing could pave the way for clarity and resolution, demonstrating a commitment to both legal integrity and health care access.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website