The High Court in Suva has granted more time for both parties involved in the case of Tevita Qaqa Kapawale to address issues related to the video recording and English transcripts pertaining to the testimony of Mitieli Cama, the second State witness. During a court session presided over by Justice Daine Tuiqereqere, Cama underwent cross-examination by Kapawale’s lawyer, Tobia Ravuniwa.

Kapawale is facing serious charges, including five counts of murder, one count of attempted murder, and one count of criminal intimidation, stemming from alleged crimes committed aboard the Fishing Vessel Tiro II between May 17 and 19, 2021. The accusations involve the deaths of three Indonesian and two Fijian men.

During the session, Cama challenged assertions made by defense counsel, particularly regarding a Police caution interview. Cama recalled the interview but did not remember being asked specific questions proposed by Ravuniwa regarding his actions on the day of the incident. Due to his inability to read the English transcript, an Itaukei court clerk was present to assist with translation. The court also paused the proceedings to allow the defense team to access the relevant video recording, which later led Cama to alter his statements regarding the duration a person could spend in the fish hold.

A notable mismatch during the proceedings was highlighted when the transcript did not align with the video recordings of Cama’s interview. Justice Tuiqereqere emphasized the necessity of resolving these discrepancies and allowed both parties to collaborate to rectify the issues.

In addition to the video discrepancies, Ravuniwa questioned Cama regarding his relationship with Salusalu Ovasisi, a fellow crew member, which Cama insisted was not contentious. However, inconsistencies arose in Cama’s accounts regarding their itinerary and the number of compartments in the fish hold, which raised further doubts about his testimony.

The trial is set to recommence on January 27, with Kapawale’s production order extended. The importance of maintaining rigorous standards in legal proceedings is evident, as it not only aims to uphold justice for the alleged victims but also assures the accused their right to a fair trial. This case continues to symbolize the critical nature of transparency in the legal system and the need for a resolution that serves justice for all involved.

As the trial progresses, there is optimism that it will clarify the events surrounding this tragic incident and lead to necessary improvements in safety protocols within maritime operations. The resilience shown by witnesses thus far underscores the importance of support and accountability in such challenging environments.