The hopes for a ‘no case to answer’ ruling for Simione Rasova and Peceli Vosanibola were once again thwarted as the Suva Magistrate’s Court postponed the case further yesterday. The legal representatives, including FICAC lawyer Josanne Pene, attended the court session with the accused, anticipating a favorable outcome. However, they were informed that Magistrate Pulekeria Low was not yet prepared to deliver the ruling.
The case has now been rescheduled for November 22. Rasova and Vosanibola, both former members of the Social Democratic Liberal Party (SODELPA), face charges of abuse of office brought forth by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC).
In an overview of Rasova’s situation, this marks the 15th postponement for him. He is charged with providing false information to a public servant by allegedly misrepresenting his residence in order to receive financial benefits. Specifically, Rasova is accused of claiming that his permanent residence was located in Nasenivolau, Nabouwalu village, Ono, Kadavu Island, which allegedly enabled him to gain $21,350 from July 2019 to April 2020.
On the other hand, Vosanibola has experienced his case adjourned for the third time. He faces similar allegations of giving false information and unlawfully obtaining financial advantages. According to accusations, Vosanibola falsely declared his permanent residence as Navuloa village, Bureta, Ovalau, resulting in an acquisition of $19,749.50 between August 2019 and March 2020. Additionally, he is accused of violating the Parliamentary Remuneration Act 2014 by wrongfully claiming travel and accommodation allowances.
The re-scheduled dates for the rulings are October 30 for Rasova and October 31 for Vosanibola.
This situation highlights the complexities of legal proceedings, reflecting both the challenges faced by the judicial system and the importance of transparency in public office. While the continued adjournments may appear frustrating, they also underscore the rigorous process in ensuring that justice is fully served. Ultimately, the outcomes of these cases could pave the way for strengthened governance and accountability in the future, restoring public confidence in the system.
Leave a comment