The president of the Fijian Teachers Association (FTA), Netani Druavesi, has ignited a heated debate by advocating for the reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools. This proposal has drawn strong criticism from various community leaders, particularly Nilesh Lal, the executive director of Dialogue Fiji, who regards this push as a concerning sign of societal regression.
Lal argues that corporal punishment is essentially a form of child abuse. He raises serious concerns about the implications of subjecting children to physical punishment after they have been nurtured in non-violent homes. He described such practices as both harmful and counterproductive, stating that they contribute to a cycle of violence. Research backs his assertions, indicating that corporal punishment can lead to heightened antisocial behaviors, academic underachievement, and long-term mental health challenges.
The alarming rates of child abuse in Fiji compound the gravity of this issue. Official statistics reveal that five out of six Fijian children endure some form of abuse or neglect, and the Fiji Police Force recorded 324 instances of child sexual abuse in just the first half of the year. Lal emphasized that advocating for increased violence against children is not only irresponsible but deeply troubling in a context where there is already significant abuse.
Additionally, Pravesh Sharma, chairperson of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission, echoes these concerns by condemning the proposal from the FTA. He stresses that any form of corporal punishment violates children’s rights, as recognized in international agreements like the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
The ongoing discourse surrounding this topic reflects a broader societal desire for more constructive and humane disciplinary methods within educational settings. While the events may seem discouraging, they provide an opportunity for communities to unite in advocating for positive changes that prioritize the well-being of children.
Moving forward, the focus must remain on implementing non-violent disciplinary strategies that ensure a safe and nurturing environment for students. This shift not only aligns with international standards for children’s rights but also fosters a more compassionate and productive educational landscape.
Leave a comment