Controversy Sparks Over Death Penalty Proposal in Fiji

Minister for Women, Children and Social Protection Lynda Tabuya’s proposal to impose the death penalty for large-scale drug traffickers has sparked significant backlash. Ketan Lal, Shadow Minister for Justice representing the Group of 16 (G16), criticized the call, arguing that Fiji should focus on advocating for life sentences for rapists and developing laws that prioritize justice for survivors rather than pursuing capital punishment.

Lal expressed disappointment that Tabuya, given her role overseeing vulnerable populations, would support such a severe measure. He emphasized the responsibility of her office to protect and empower those affected by serious crimes such as rape, which he described as life-altering and often leaves permanent scars.

“Rape is undoubtedly one of the most atrocious crimes, demanding serious attention and appropriate responses,” Lal stated. He suggested that Fiji should develop a legal framework that guarantees timely and effective justice for victims of sexual violence while ensuring the protection of all individuals’ rights. “Our efforts should be directed toward defending the lives and rights of those who have been most harmed, rather than reintroducing the death penalty.”

Lal acknowledged the necessity of a vigorous fight against drug trafficking but cautioned against adopting measures that could conflict with Fiji’s Constitution and human rights obligations. He urged against allowing fear to drive policy decisions that could be both unconstitutional and ineffective. “We should prioritize strengthening laws against crimes like rape, ensuring justice, and upholding the rights of all Fijians.”

Furthermore, he pointed out that while drug trafficking poses significant challenges, advocating for the death penalty contradicts Fiji’s constitutional values and international commitments. He referenced Article 8 of Fiji’s Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and protection from cruel and degrading treatment.

Restoring the death penalty would not only contravene these essential rights but also undermine the integrity of Fiji’s justice system, which is founded on human dignity and the rule of law. Lal underscored that Fiji’s adherence to international treaties opposing the death penalty signifies the country’s commitment to human rights on the global stage. He warned that any attempt to reintroduce such a harsh measure would be a regression, damaging Fiji’s international image and moral standing.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website