The president of the Fijian Teachers Association, Netani Druavesi, has ignited a contentious debate by proposing the reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools. This suggestion has been met with widespread criticism, particularly from Nilesh Lal, the executive director of Dialogue Fiji, who expressed concern about the implications of such a move.
Lal described the proposal as a disturbing sign of societal regression, emphasizing the importance of alternative disciplinary measures that focus on the well-being of students. He categorized corporal punishment as a form of child abuse, warning against the detrimental effects it could have on children who are raised in loving, non-violent households only to face physical harm at school. Lal argued that allowing teachers to hit students would be unacceptable for any caring parent.
Research supports Lal’s stance, indicating that corporal punishment does not lead to positive outcomes and instead contributes to a culture of violence. It can exacerbate antisocial behavior, increase defiance, and hinder academic achievement, especially for children who thrive in safe, supportive learning environments. Furthermore, findings have linked corporal punishment to long-term mental health challenges, substance abuse, and difficulties in forming healthy relationships.
Echoing these concerns, Pravesh Sharma, chairperson of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission, condemned the call for reinstating corporal punishment. He indicated that such practices would violate both constitutional and human rights standards, particularly those safeguarding children from physical and mental harm. Sharma stressed that Fiji has obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which mandates protection for children against all forms of violence and abuse.
The alarming rates of child abuse in Fiji, as highlighted by the Assistant Minister for Women, Children, and Social Protection, Sashi Kiran, underscore the urgency of addressing these issues. With reports indicating that five out of every six children in Fiji experience abuse or neglect, the advocacy for harsher disciplinary measures appears not only misguided but potentially dangerous.
In summary, the push for corporal punishment has drawn significant backlash from various sectors, focusing on the need for non-violent disciplinary strategies that foster a nurturing educational environment. The continued debate reveals a societal commitment to child protection and a move towards more positive child-rearing practices.
Overall, while the topic is sensitive and filled with strong opinions, it highlights a collective yearning for a safer, more compassionate educational system that can support children’s growth and development in a constructive manner.
Leave a comment