Constitutional Evolution: A Call for Public Engagement and Legal Clarity

Attorney-General Graham Leung has defended the Government’s position on the Constitutional Amendment Bill, stating that recent discussions in Parliament exemplified a functioning democracy. He praised the valuable exchange of opinions, which allowed Members of Parliament (MPs) to articulate their perspectives on important constitutional issues.

Leung underscored the necessity of public participation in any proposed constitutional amendments, emphasizing that civil society and the youth must be involved in the process. He reassured citizens that the core democratic principles of equal rights and human dignity would remain unchallenged as the Government navigates these changes.

He also disclosed that the Cabinet plans to seek clarification from the Supreme Court on certain constitutional provisions that may be at odds with existing requirements. This referral is expected to occur soon, allowing the Chief Justice to organize the judicial panel and the court’s timetable.

Addressing accusations that the Government has operated outside constitutional norms regarding the Amendment Bill, Leung asserted that the bill’s introduction and successful first reading was a noteworthy achievement, despite opposition claims questioning its legitimacy. He affirmed that all actions taken were lawful and received the necessary Speaker’s endorsement.

Leung pointed out that the existing supermajority requirement creates rigidities in amending the constitution, prompting the Government to consider alternative legal strategies in case the Supreme Court does not approve the proposed changes. He emphasized the importance of allowing the court to undertake its responsibilities without undue pressure.

This dialogue surrounding constitutional amendments aligns with Leung’s previous remarks about the need for a dynamic constitution that adapts to society’s evolving needs. The ongoing discussions denote a commitment to comprehensive deliberation, drawing in various political and civic viewpoints. This approach illustrates a hopeful outlook for constructive reforms in governance, potentially leading to a more representative and responsive constitutional framework that resonates with the public’s aspirations.