Savenaca Narube, the leader of UNITY Fiji, has expressed significant concerns regarding the difficulty of amending the country’s Constitution, particularly Chapter 11, which outlines the amendment procedures. He noted that the 2013 Constitution is one of the most challenging worldwide to amend. This complex framework requires a three-quarters consensus from both Members of Parliament and the registered voting public, a hurdle he believes the current government may find insurmountable.

Narube indicated that any attempt to amend the Constitution without adhering to its stipulated procedures would likely fail and be vulnerable to legal challenges. He suggested that the most productive course of action may be to question the Constitution’s overall validity in a court of law, citing a lack of momentum on this issue since the government came to power over two years ago.

Reflecting on the broader political landscape, Narube noted that all opposition parties had previously prioritized constitutional reform leading up to the 2022 elections, but momentum has significantly waned since. He emphasized the importance of clarity in the goals of any proposed constitutional review, cautioning against political expediency.

Despite his pessimism about effectively amending the Constitution, Narube stressed that UNITY Fiji would engage in the process if it commences, ensuring they remain vigilant about its implications.

Additionally, similar discussions have emerged from government officials, including Attorney-General Graham Leung, who has also highlighted the challenges imposed by the 2013 Constitution. He has indicated an awareness of public sentiment regarding constitutional reform, recognizing the pressing need to engage thoughtfully with these complex issues amidst upcoming elections.

In light of these developments, the ongoing dialogue surrounding Fiji’s Constitution appears both challenging and vital. Stakeholders from various political backgrounds are urged to foster a cooperative environment that facilitates transparency and public engagement in governance. While the task ahead is daunting, there is an opportunity for positive change that reflects the diverse needs and aspirations of the Fijian populace.

In summary, the discourse around Fiji’s Constitution is marked by complexities but is underscored by a collective desire for a framework that adequately represents all citizens. As political leaders navigate these challenges, the potential for meaningful reform remains, emphasizing the importance of a united approach towards an adaptable and democratic governance structure.