Attorney-General Graham Leung has suggested that one approach to amending the 2013 Constitution is to seek an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of its amendment provisions. During a recent media conference, he expressed his belief that a constitution should evolve alongside the society it governs, stating, “the world doesn’t stand still.”

Leung noted that the government is aware of the public’s desire for change and is prepared to consider how best to proceed. As the year 2025 approaches, leading up to an anticipated general election in 2026, the agenda for government law-making is becoming increasingly congested. He emphasized that the decision on whether changes to the constitution will be implemented all at once or in phases is still undecided.

He highlighted the possibility of starting with smaller, more manageable amendments before addressing larger issues. However, Leung was clear that this is not a simple process; the removal of the current constitution raises complex questions, especially given the political landscape that has evolved since its implementation.

“Thoughtful consideration and bipartisan collaboration are necessary for any amendments to be successful,” Leung said, acknowledging the potential consequences of hasty changes. He referred to the constitutional framework as the “supreme law of the country,” underscoring its fundamental importance to overall governance.

Leung also cited the challenges illustrated by Professor Anthony Reagan of the Australian National University, who described Fiji’s Constitution as particularly difficult to amend. He questioned the power dynamics involved in changing the constitution, suggesting it could be easier for “a camel to go through the eye of a needle” than to achieve such consensus among lawmakers and voters. He concluded on a hopeful note, emphasizing the value of differing opinions in a democratic society, as constructive discourse is essential for progress.

This dialogue offers a thoughtful perspective on the future of governance, uplifting the idea that while change is necessary, it must be met with care and consideration. The possibility of an inclusive approach to constitutional reform could invigorate public participation and foster unity, leading to more resilient governance structures.