The Commission of Inquiry (COI) has publicly acknowledged that there were no falsifications concerning the documents of lawyer Janet Mason. This clarification follows what the commission termed an “honest assumption” made by Solicitor General Ropate Green, leading to some misunderstandings. In a statement, the COI expressed regret for the confusion and reaffirmed its position on associated procedural matters.
The COI explained that the issue arose when Mr. Green printed only the statutory declaration and submitted it along with the initial application. Mason was officially informed via an email on January 22, and arrangements were made to address her concerns in an upcoming meeting.
Despite ongoing disciplinary proceedings against her in New Zealand, the COI confirmed that Mason holds a valid practicing certificate. The commission stated, “While we differ with Ms Mason’s view on the requirement to hold a practicing certificate for the purpose of appearing before the COI… we appreciate her compliance.”
This incident unfolds against the backdrop of scrutiny faced by Mason due to a misconduct finding from the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal, a decision she is appealing. The Fiji Law Society had previously recommended that she step aside from her role in the COI based on concerns about her ability to uphold public confidence in the inquiry’s integrity. They have emphasized that maintaining high professional standards is critical, especially given the inquiry’s significance.
Mason has consistently defended her integrity, asserting that her involvement in the inquiry is crucial to ensuring transparent governance practices, despite the ongoing challenges. She has lodged a police report alleging document tampering related to her practicing certificate application and has confronted accusations concerning her professional conduct.
This situation presents a pivotal moment for Fiji’s governance, with expectations that the inquiry could lead to necessary reforms promoting greater transparency and accountability. As the COI progresses, there is hope that it will reinforce ethical governance standards and restore public trust in Fiji’s legal and political systems.
In summary, while there are ongoing challenges regarding Janet Mason’s role, the COI’s assurances and the scrutiny surrounding the inquiry may catalyze significant advancements in governance practices within Fiji. There remains optimism that the findings will foster ethical standards and enhance public confidence in its institutions.
Leave a comment