Chaudhry Slams Government’s Health Policy: ‘Lives Matter More Than Money!’

Former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry has criticized the current government for its handling of health care issues, particularly concerning the Ministry of Health and Medical Services. His remarks come in response to concerns raised by the Fiji Medical Association (FMA) regarding the negative impact of removing overtime payments for medical staff, particularly in the Radiology and Pharmaceutical Department at CWM Hospital.

Chaudhry expressed disapproval of Deputy Prime Minister Biman Prasad’s dismissive comment telling health authorities to “sort it out” themselves. He deemed this response inappropriate, arguing that the government’s cost-cutting measure of replacing overtime with time off in lieu reflects a more significant issue of budget constraints affecting public health.

He emphasized that this policy, which applies across the entire civil service, compromises patient safety and places undue strain on existing medical staff, especially amid a recognized shortage of doctors and nurses. Chaudhry referenced FMA President Dr. Alipate Vakamocea, who pointed out the challenging working conditions faced by medical teams and underscored the need for fair compensation.

Chaudhry called for a more responsible response from the Minister, suggesting that there should be a willingness to engage with medical professionals to find solutions instead of dismissing their concerns. He believes that addressing these critical issues is essential for sustaining health care delivery in Fiji.

This situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by health care professionals in the country, emphasizing the need for collaborative dialogues between government officials and medical associations to ensure the welfare of both the staff and the patients they serve.

In summary, the conversation initiated by Chaudhry sheds light on the critical issues within Fiji’s health care system, calling for attention to the needs of health care workers and the importance of maintaining high standards of patient care despite financial constraints. There is hope that this dialogue could lead to more constructive solutions that prioritize life and health over budgetary limitations.