Deputy Opposition Whip Ketan Lal emphasized the necessity of transparency and independence in the Mercy Commission, highlighting that its decisions are crucial to justice and fairness in society. Lal raised concerns regarding the commission’s composition, questioning the identities of its members and the process by which they are appointed.
He also sought clarification on the qualifications and criteria that determine their eligibility for such important roles. “Additionally, what degree of influence does the government exert over this commission? These questions are not trivial,” he stated.
Lal expressed that a lack of transparency in the appointment process or excessive political influence could erode public trust and cast doubt on the commission’s ability to function impartially. He insisted that it is essential for the public to know not only who comprises the commission but also how political dynamics may affect its decisions.
“Without clear answers, we risk compromising the integrity of a body that must remain independent and free from government interference,” he warned.
In contrast, Prime Minister Rabuka defended the recent decisions made by the Mercy Commission, including the pardons of George Speight and Shane Stevens. He asserted that these decisions were made following due process without any external interference. Rabuka framed these actions as integral to the nation’s ongoing reconciliation efforts, suggesting that Fiji’s journey toward unity and growth involves reflecting on the past to create a better future together.