Opposition Member of Parliament Premila Kumar has criticized Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent cabinet expansion, which includes the appointment of seven new ministers and assistant ministers. Kumar claims this move contradicts the government’s pre-election promise to reduce both costs and the size of the administration. She argued that instead of addressing inefficiencies within the current government, Rabuka’s decision has resulted in a cabinet that has now grown to 34 members, comprising 22 Cabinet Ministers and 12 Assistant Ministers—one of the largest in Fiji’s history.

Kumar expressed her disappointment, questioning, “What happened to their promise of reducing government size and cutting unnecessary costs?” She criticized the expansion as a way to protect underperforming ministers instead of holding them accountable, labeling it a “bailout” that undermines the interests of hardworking Fijians. Kumar also raised concerns about the financial burden this creates for taxpayers, especially in a time when many are struggling with high living costs.

She highlighted that the funds allocated to support this enlarged cabinet could be better used to address urgent national needs, such as aiding families affected by floods, remedying chronic shortages of medications in hospitals, and repairing deteriorating infrastructure. “Why add unnecessary expenses to taxpayers already struggling with a high cost of living?” she questioned.

In response, Prime Minister Rabuka defended the cabinet expansion, asserting that it is intended to enhance government efficiency and service delivery, rather than an attempt to consolidate power in anticipation of the 2026 General Election. However, critics, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, have echoed Kumar’s sentiments, arguing that the decision reflects a financial irresponsibility that detracts from addressing essential public service needs.

Despite the backlash, this situation presents a critical opportunity for constructive discussions about governance in Fiji. Observers hope that increased scrutiny will motivate the government to refocus its priorities, ensuring that public service delivery and accountability are improved moving forward. There is potential for growth in civic engagement and political reform that could strengthen the relationship between the government and its citizens, leading to a more effective administration.

In summary, while the cabinet expansion has sparked significant criticism for its perceived inefficiency and lack of accountability, it also offers a critical opportunity for reform. This moment may inspire discussions that prioritize the genuine concerns of the public, potentially reshaping governance in Fiji to better serve its citizens. The growing dialogue surrounding this issue may lead to meaningful changes, encouraging a more responsive government that truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the Fijian populace.