The recent decision to increase Fiji’s Cabinet to 22 members with the appointment of three additional Cabinet ministers and three assistant ministers has sparked controversy, primarily for potentially breaching a coalition agreement from 2022. This agreement, established between The People’s Alliance (PA), the National Federation Party (NFP), and SODELPA, explicitly limits the Cabinet size to 20 members.

The new appointments have rekindled discussions about the adherence to Clause 4 of the coalition agreement, which stipulates that the Cabinet should not exceed 20 ministers. This development has raised eyebrows regarding the stability of the coalition government. The Prime Minister is mandated to be from PA, accompanied by three Deputy Prime Ministers—one each from PA, NFP, and SODELPA. While the Prime Minister has the authority to allocate ministerial portfolios, the need for consultation with coalition partners remains essential.

Political analysts and opposition leaders have voiced their concerns over this expansion, arguing that it complicates governance at a time when Fiji faces significant socio-economic challenges. This move is particularly alarming considering the government’s previous reshuffles, including a recent appointment of several independent Members of Parliament, which many perceive adds unnecessary bureaucratic layers without directly addressing issues such as poverty and the high cost of living.

Moreover, the recent reassignment of portfolios related to Policing, Immigration, and Climate Change has led to questions about the priorities of the government in addressing significant issues affecting the Fijian populace. Critics like former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry have deemed this expansion “irresponsible,” citing concerns about the burden it places on taxpayers amid economic difficulties.

However, amid the criticisms, there remains a glimmer of hope that this political transition could lead to improved governance. Supporters argue that a larger Cabinet may enhance the government’s capacity to respond to pressing social issues and allow for more effective policy reforms. This perspective suggests that, despite the turbulence, the evolving political landscape could facilitate a more responsive administration.

In summary, while this Cabinet reshuffle raises serious questions about adherence to political agreements and fiscal responsibility, it also presents an opportunity for the Fijian government to realign its objectives and priorities, aiming to foster public trust and ensure the well-being of its citizens. As the nation navigates these changes, the hope persists for a governance structure that is not just functional but genuinely reflective of the people’s needs.