Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent decision to expand Fiji’s Cabinet from 20 to 22 ministers has stirred considerable debate and raised significant concerns about its adherence to the Coalition Agreement formed between the People’s Alliance, the National Federation Party, and the Social Democratic Liberal Party in 2022. This agreement explicitly limits the Cabinet to 20 members, leading to questions about possible violations that could impact the stability of the coalition government.

Constitutional lawyer Jon Apted has emphasized that this Cabinet expansion represents a breach of the Coalition Agreement, which, while described as a “gentleman’s agreement” and not legally binding, relies heavily on mutual respect and cooperation among the coalition partners. Apted noted that should any party perceive a breach, they could raise the issue internally or potentially leave the coalition. He also clarified that there are no constitutional barriers preventing independent Members of Parliament who were previously part of a party from serving in a government composed of different political parties.

The backdrop to this political shift is particularly stark, as Fiji grapples with challenges in its sugarcane sector, where many growers are contemplating leaving the industry due to uncertainties about their future. This economic strain amplifies public demands for government accountability and effective responses to urgent socio-economic issues such as climate change and the rising cost of living.

Public sentiment regarding the Cabinet expansion is polarized. Supporters argue that increasing the number of ministers could enhance the government’s capacity to effectively address pressing issues, while critics, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, contend that this move may create unnecessary bureaucracy without adequately addressing fundamental concerns like poverty and economic hardship.

Despite the controversies surrounding the Cabinet expansion, there is a prevailing sense of hope among observers that these political changes could lead to better governance. The expectation is that as the government reassesses its priorities and engages more transparently with citizens, it can cultivate a relationship built on trust and responsiveness.

In summary, while Prime Minister Rabuka’s decision raises important questions about compliance with coalition agreements and governance effectiveness, it also presents a valuable opportunity for reform within Fiji’s political landscape. Should the government navigate these changes thoughtfully, it may emerge more unified and capable of addressing the diverse challenges facing its citizens, paving the way for a brighter and more collaborative future.