Last week, the focus was on the 1987 coup in Fiji, a pivotal moment that compelled many baby boomers to leave the country they cherished. These individuals represented the pride of two generations who worked tirelessly, overcoming numerous challenges to achieve a sense of stability and success. However, this stability was abruptly interrupted at 10 AM on May 14, 1987, leading many to find themselves once again in foreign lands, much like during historical periods of Girmit.
Much discourse has emerged regarding the negative implications of the coup, which Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has recently acknowledged responsibility for initiating. The political landscape had been marked by escalating tensions before the coup, particularly due to the economic successes of the Indo-Fijians, who became a distinct ethnic group apart from the indigenous Fijians. This economic reality often created friction, which, compounded by a few powerful figures, eventually contributed to the coup’s inevitability.
The coup of 1987 disrupted a delicate balance in Fiji’s governance structure and led to ongoing political instability that has characterized the country ever since. The subsequent regime, marked by suppression, was arguably a response to the chaos created by the coup and revealed underlying societal fractures that persisted within the political landscape.
However, it is essential to explore the positive outcomes from this difficult chapter in Fiji’s history. Many Indo-Fijians who felt compelled to leave the country found greater opportunities abroad, emerging as successful individuals who have made substantial contributions to Fiji through remittances and investments. The exodus allowed for a reevaluation of ethnic representation within the civil service, enabling ethnic Fijians to fill positions vacated by Indo-Fijians.
Moreover, the departure of many Indo-Fijians eased tensions in job competition, which had been a significant source of strife prior to the coup. This shift not only diffused immediate sectoral pressures but also fostered an environment where cross-cultural relationships could develop more authentically as Indo-Fijians reassessed their connections to local communities.
The coup also initiated a transformation in property ownership dynamics, as distressed emigrants were often forced to sell their homes, providing ethnic Fijians an opportunity to acquire property and learn about its responsibilities, thereby fostering a new chapter in community relations.
In assessing the coup’s lasting impacts, it is clear that amidst the pain and upheaval, there have been avenues for growth and understanding that have emerged. While there remains much to address in terms of political stability and societal cohesion, the resilience shown by Fijians, both domestically and abroad, offers a foundation for hopeful advancements in the future.
Additionally, as we keep the severely injured boxer Udayd Haider and his family in our thoughts, it’s crucial to remember that every community shared its narrative of struggle and overcoming adversity. Until next week, let’s remain hopeful and engaged in the progress that lies ahead.
Leave a comment