Amnesty Debate: Can Fiji Truly Move Forward?

A University of the South Pacific (USP) academic warns against granting amnesty to individuals involved in political activities that could destabilize Fiji. Rajendra Prasad addressed a public lecture at USP, emphasizing the recent amnesty extended to those responsible for political turmoil from 1987 until the 2013 Constitution was enacted.

Mr. Prasad expressed optimism about the reconciliation process but stressed that the concept of amnesty and similar provisions have been entrenched in previous and the current constitution. He stated, “I don’t believe anybody or any appointed truth commission can go beyond the Constitution.” He emphasized the need to focus on ensuring that past events do not recur in Fiji’s political landscape.

Reflecting on Fiji’s troubled history, Mr. Prasad noted that citizens have endured significant hardships. He referenced the absence of a truth and reconciliation process previously, stating that the 1990 Constitution, imposed by the military, was seen as one of the most racially divisive constitutions globally. While the subsequent 1997 Constitution was an improvement, it too had flaws. He remarked on the optimism surrounding both past constitutions, hoping that a similar hopeful perspective would prevail regarding the current commission’s ability to prevent further political instability.

Mr. Prasad reiterated that while amnesty has been granted in the past up to the 2013 Constitution, it is imperative that future Truth and Reconciliation Commissions do not offer amnesty to anyone engaging in politically destabilizing actions. He articulated the importance of not reopening old wounds, urging the nation to move forward, and highlighted the necessity for clear communication regarding the commission’s structure, language, power, and forward-moving plans to the Fiji populace.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website